Radeon R7 250 vs A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
717
A16 PCIe
+505%
4339
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
GA107
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
