Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs FirePro M5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+761%
3723
FirePro M5725
432
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
4
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
M96
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M96 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
