Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
GT200B
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
