Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +53323%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
4
9216
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G84
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy