Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1710MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +1664%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
A10G +3324%
3664
Quadro M2000
107
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
9216
Shading Units
768
288
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GM206
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy