Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +21595%
4.339 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2010
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy