Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs H200 SXM

AMD Instinct MI300X vs H200 SXM

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (2100MHz vs 1980MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 141GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 4800GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
H200 SXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (700W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +143%
163.4 TFLOPS
H200 SXM
67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Nov 2023
Instinct
Generation
Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1590 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
141GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM3e
8192bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
4800GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
19456
Shading Units
16896
880
TMUs
528
0
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1979 TFLOPS
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
67 TFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34 TFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
700W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GH200
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
146 billion
Transistors
80 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy