Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FireGL V8650

Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +3809%
17.2 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
R600
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy