Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +3850%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
6144
Shading Units
112
192
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

350W
TDP
78W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy