Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1104%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1303 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
24
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
18W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy