Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M40

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +1760%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy