CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L40 CNX
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L40 CNX
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA L40 CNX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 864.0GB/s)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
9984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
L40 CNX
+509%
89.97 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
L40 CNX
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
18176
256
TMUs
568
128
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
4 nm
8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy