CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+315%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K5200
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy