Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +315%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy