Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro S10000

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro S10000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (1837MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
15104 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (375W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +1723%
62.08 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Nov 2012
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
16896
Shading Units
1792
528
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Zaphod
Blackwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
208 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
Unknown
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

1000W
TDP
375W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy