Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1650MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +843%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Oland
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy