Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +756%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2014
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tonga
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy