Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FireStream 9170

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +12%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV670
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy