Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (28GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (158W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO V710 +6184%
27.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2024
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
224bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
54
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
3456
16
TMUs
216
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
54
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
158W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 32
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy