Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy