Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro S9100

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro S9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
R500
Architecture
GCN 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy