Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI FirePro V4800

ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
400
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy