Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W2100

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 32W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
26W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Oland
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy