Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
R500
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy