Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jul 2019
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy