Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jul 2019
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
283.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.12 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
9.062 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
283.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-410-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy