Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy