Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
R500
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy