Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 470

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 470

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 120W)
AMD Radeon RX 470 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1206MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2016
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
926 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1650 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
211.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 PRO (215-0876204)
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy