Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +6293%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1152
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GK104
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy