Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel GMA 3100

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel GMA 3100

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2007
Trinity
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
FSB

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
-
905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Bearlake
A300
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy