Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1500MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 384SP +65%
1.152 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2020
Trinity
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.304 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1152 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Renoir
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
9.8 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy