Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1000MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +171%
0.695 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 4000
0.256 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2012
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
256.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Ivy Bridge GT2
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 7.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
22 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.2 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
133 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.0
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy