Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel GMA X4500

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel GMA X4500

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock905MHz
304 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +717%
0.695 TFLOPS
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
Trinity
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
FSB

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
-
905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
10
8
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
533.0 MPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.330 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
85.28 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Eaglelake
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy