Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon 680M

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon 680M

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2200MHz vs 905MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon 680M +386%
3.379 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
Trinity
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.758 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.379 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Rembrandt
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
13.1 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy