Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

AMD FirePro A300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +663%
0.695 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
Trinity
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
-
905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
C89
A300
GPU Variant
MCP89
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
32 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy