Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
16816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +77500%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro Remote
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
80
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GB100
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
208 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy