Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +677%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
80
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy