Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1203MHz vs 950MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +38%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
Unknown
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GM206S
Orthrus
GPU Variant
950 OEM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy