Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1425MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +211%
3.405 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
30W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Orthrus
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy