Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs Intel Arc A780

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs Intel Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (2200MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Arc A780 +429%
18.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
200W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-512
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy