Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FirePro S9050 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +20%
3.226 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy