Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon X1650

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV516
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy