Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V9800

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +335%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
20
480
Shading Units
1600
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Cypress
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy