Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +231%
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
72
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT215
Turks GL
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy