Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +1621%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
48
1280
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 32
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy