Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI +48%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Lexa
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy