Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +289%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GT200
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy