Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +4799%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
768
Shading Units
16896
48
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GB100
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
208 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy