Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +4991%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
5376
48
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 31
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy