Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 126% (2034MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600M +954%
7.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1224 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
66
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy